← Back to strategies

Risk & execution · 7 min read

A good entry still needs an exit rule.

Compare fixed and partial exits using the original cash risk denominator. A higher win rate is not the same thing as a better result.

One question to answerHow much R did a partial exit really earn?

The lesson on YouTube

Watch. Then work through the idea.

Watch the English lesson first, then use the worked example and quiz below to check the idea. The article is a companion, not a transcript.

Loading connects to YouTube and may transmit device data or use storage. Privacy details. Alternatively, watch on YouTube ↗.

What is actually happening?

R normalizes a result by the initial declared risk. A weighted partial exit combines the fraction of the original size with each exit’s return. Costs and actual fills matter; reducing size does not justify changing the original denominator.

Keep the boundary clear. A chart observation does not reveal a participant’s identity, intention or future orders.

Guided example · Alternative exit paths · original-risk denominator

Weight every partial exit

Use the original position and original risk as the denominator throughout.

Restart & example assumptions

Authored synthetic observations, shown in sequence. Every comparison uses only the revealed data. This is a worked learning example, not live prices, broker execution or a profitability backtest. Follow the article’s exact definitions; measurements and pattern names alone do not authorize a trade.

For charts: tap a candle or swing to inspect it; drag horizontally to browse; wheel or +/− to zoom; arrow keys to inspect; Home to restore the step view.

Make the conditions explicit.

01 / CONTEXT

Choose a fixed exit policy before entry. For comparison, hold the entry, stop, sample and friction assumptions constant.

02 / TRIGGER

Example partial policy: close half the position at +1R and the rest at +2R, without inventing a different policy once price starts moving.

03 / CANCEL OR INVALIDATE

If the first target never trades under your fill rules, do not record a partial fill. If the protective stop executes, record the actual result and residual size.

The quoted rules are illustrative research specifications. Parameters are not recommendations and have not been presented as profitable backtest results.

What can this cost?

Additional exits can add transaction costs and execution complexity. Moving a stop to entry does not guarantee a zero-loss fill.

Calculate the size from your assumptions

How the idea can fail.

A partial policy may feel comfortable but truncate the trades that provided most of a sample’s gains. A fixed policy can suffer longer losing sequences.

Practical habit

Record fractions, prices and costs for every fill. Compare net R across all eligible signals, not just attractive examples.

Go one level deeper

Report distribution, drawdown, trade count and the sensitivity of results to worse fills. Do not choose a policy from a few memorable trades.

Check your understanding

Half at +1R and half at −1R equals what before costs?

Choose one answer

Further reading & boundaries

These examples are original educational exercises. General background: CME Group: position sizing; Fidelity: technical analysis. Neither endorses these example rules. No hypothetical result establishes future profitability.

Editorial revision: 13 October 2026 · Synthetic data · Educational use

Keep buildingHonest replay testing